Edith, I hear you on this issue....obviously you’re somewhat frustrated, and most anyone in your position would be frustrated too.
You’re absolutely right that giving two weeks notice is the right call even if you technically don;t have to...especially in a small market where everyone knows everyone. A devil’s advocate would probably ask you if leaving your current employer after less than 6 months is the best idea (especially in the same city)...no matter how much better a new role is. Susan Strayer had some advice for one of our blog members in somewhat of a similar situation a few weeks ago:
here’s a quote:
“...you want to ask yourself if you are really being fair--to yourself, to your colleagues and to your company. You send a strong message when you leave this early--that you are disrespecting the company and your colleagues who have likely worked to both train you, welcome you and onboard you. You owe it to them to give it more time. You also owe it to yourself. You hurt your own career brand if you leave this soon, and people in the industry talk. Is that a risk you really want to take? ”
This may not apply to you specifically, but it’s worth a mention… know you said that your current job is not ideal for you, but being a “serial job switcher” can really hurt your career.
If the G.M. of the new property hasn’t gotten back to you then it could be because he/she is super busy with the hotel opening, or doesn’t (for whatever reason) think you’re the right candidate. ...either way, I don’t see how contacting again will hurt your case under the circumstances.
Anyone else care to comment?